पाठ 25 / 25
An OpenTelemetry Checklist
Review before relying on it.
Questions to ask
Does every service set service.name, service.version and environment? Do traces cross every service boundary, including queues? Are span names low-cardinality and attributes following semantic conventions? Are logs correlated with trace IDs? Is a Collector in place with memory_limiter and batch processors? Is the sampling strategy deliberate and documented? Are sensitive values excluded and redacted? Are Collector health and dropped data monitored?
The checklist
Use it in reviews.
[ ] service.name, service.version, deployment.environment.name on every service
[ ] W3C trace context propagated over HTTP, gRPC and message queues
[ ] zero-code instrumentation + manual spans on key business paths
[ ] span names low-cardinality; semantic convention attribute names
[ ] logs carry trace_id/span_id; metrics have bounded attributes
[ ] Collector pipelines: memory_limiter first, batch last
[ ] sampling strategy documented (parent-based head and/or tail)
[ ] PII and secrets excluded; redaction in the Collector; TLS + auth
[ ] Collector self-metrics monitored (refused / dropped data)
[ ] backend retention and cost reviewedRevisit the checklist after incidents
Each incident reveals a missing span, attribute or log; feed it back into instrumentation.
त्वरित जाँच: Which belongs on an OpenTelemetry checklist?
- Disable context propagation for speed
- Put user emails in span names
- Every service sets service.name and service.version
- Export without any batching
Answer
Every service sets service.name and service.version — Consistent identity enables everything else.